Dorothy Bain is the Lord Advocate of Scotland and, as such, the country's most senior criminal prosecutor. She's now got herself into a very big pickle and entirely of her own making.
After the decision had been made at Crown Office to prosecute Nicola Sturgeon's husband, Mr Murrell, on charges of fraud allegedly amounting to £460,000, Ms Bain wrote to First Minister John Swinney advising him the details of an indictment and charges that had been served on Mr Murrell and that the case was calling in court on 20 February. This was an extremely unusual and extremely stupid thing for a Lord Advocate to do as it didn't concern Swinney in any way. Neither the public nor the Press was informed, only Swinney.
All hell broke loose subsequently and the matter called in the Scottish Parliament yesterday when Ms Bain tried to explain herself to MSPs. She failed miserably and appeared utterly clueless. Essentially, she had no answer to what she did and, bizarrely, maintained that once an indictment had been served on an accused the matter was then public. However, her underlings at Crown Office refute this and say an indictment is a public matter only when it first calls in court. They cannot both be right ...... and common sense indicates to us that the underlings, rather than the Lord Advocate, are correct.
The Conservatives claimed the circumstances 'smacks of corruption' but such claim is, in our view, grossly over the top. Rather, it smacks entirely of incompetence and stupidity.
On any view the Lord Advocate is clearly out of her depth. That's the worrying bit.